Yes. IMP ICFP draws staffing directly from IMP Planner, so curriculum and finance leads across your trust are always working from the most recent staffing profile when allocating curriculum resource and planning budgets for the term and year ahead.

Yes. Our ICFP reporting suite provides powerful and insightful measures that can be analysed and compared across the whole trust, even when subjects and/or timetable definitions vary by school. To do this, it uses standardised metrics and groups schools with similar characteristics.

Any and all of them. IMP ICFP is flexible enough to accommodate all school types including secondary, primary, nursery, special, alternative provision, all-through and middle schools. If you have specific requirements, just ask us how we can help.

With the ability to allocate staff to an unlimited number of non-contact activities, we've removed the vague old approach to understanding the use of this time. With IMP ICFP, you can quickly understand the cost of each non-contact activity and how this is split between leadership, teaching and non-teaching staff across every school.

Three types. First, benchmark internally across your trust — your own data, fully trusted and contextual. Second, set aspirational targets for different school types and measure against them. Third, use ISBL's ASOT benchmarks: 19 industry-recognised metrics showing what good looks like for your school's type and geography, not just how you compare to everyone else. All RAG rated, so you can see at a glance where to focus the conversation.

Absolutely. We recognise that off-payroll staff can and probably will deliver part of the curriculum. Curriculum requirements can be allocated against external contractors (e.g. sports coaches or peripatetic music teachers). Their costs will then be included in reporting and benchmarking analysis, giving you a truer picture of what's going on across your schools.